From 874164e61573e77e76a016818b91904385ac8cc8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mathieu Schroeter <mathieu@schroetersa.ch>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 22:23:15 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Try to keep more Blupi in some cases

It's possible to lost a Blupi (render) when some Blupi are staying
around an object like tomatoes. With this workaround, the render order
is not perfect but at least the Blupi is visible.
---
 src/decor.cxx | 13 +++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/decor.cxx b/src/decor.cxx
index 56873ec..23357e0 100644
--- a/src/decor.cxx
+++ b/src/decor.cxx
@@ -620,8 +620,17 @@ void CDecor::BuildPutBlupi()
 
                     if (m_rankBlupi[x][y] != -1)    // déjà occupé ?
                     {
-                        //?                     OutputDebug(">>> Manque un blupi <<<\n");
-                        continue;  // que faire d'autre ?
+                        /* MS: It's not right but at least less Blupi are
+                         * lost (invisible). The logic is not very clear, then
+                         * consider the following code as a workaround.
+                         */
+                        if (x == m_blupi[rank].cel.x)
+                            x++;
+                        else
+                            x = m_blupi[rank].cel.x;
+
+                        if (m_rankBlupi[x][y] != -1)
+                            continue;  // que faire d'autre ?
                     }
                 }
             }