From cb8dd19c5dc2e3c38df2d40a615d94dbcd7a69bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Collins <solemnwarning@solemnwarning.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 01:37:25 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Updated getsockopt()

---
 src/winsock.c | 9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/winsock.c b/src/winsock.c
index 9b54142..680d21e 100644
--- a/src/winsock.c
+++ b/src/winsock.c
@@ -520,8 +520,8 @@ int WSAAPI getsockopt(SOCKET fd, int level, int optname, char FAR *optval, int F
 					return -1;
 				}
 				
-				memset(ipxdata->netnum, 0, 4);
-				memcpy(ipxdata->nodenum, nic->hwaddr, 6);
+				memcpy(ipxdata->netnum, nic->ipx_net, 4);
+				memcpy(ipxdata->nodenum, nic->ipx_node, 6);
 				
 				/* TODO: LAN/WAN detection, link speed detection */
 				ipxdata->wan = FALSE;
@@ -532,6 +532,11 @@ int WSAAPI getsockopt(SOCKET fd, int level, int optname, char FAR *optval, int F
 				RETURN(0);
 			}
 			
+			/* NOTE: IPX_MAX_ADAPTER_NUM implies it may be the maximum index
+			 * for referencing an IPX interface. This behaviour makes no sense
+			 * and a code example in MSDN implies it should be the number of
+			 * IPX interfaces, this code follows the latter.
+			*/
 			if(optname == IPX_MAX_ADAPTER_NUM) {
 				CHECK_OPTLEN(sizeof(int));