From c9750f6657f2d7946bc081eb55333981d7c97cb3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Philip Rebohle <philip.rebohle@tu-dortmund.de>
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2022 16:57:09 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [dxvk] Don't use spinlocks for CS chunk pool

No reason to anymore since SRWLocks are fast enough here.
---
 src/dxvk/dxvk_cs.cpp | 4 ++--
 src/dxvk/dxvk_cs.h   | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/dxvk/dxvk_cs.cpp b/src/dxvk/dxvk_cs.cpp
index af76e138..7061f1a6 100644
--- a/src/dxvk/dxvk_cs.cpp
+++ b/src/dxvk/dxvk_cs.cpp
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ namespace dxvk {
   DxvkCsChunk* DxvkCsChunkPool::allocChunk(DxvkCsChunkFlags flags) {
     DxvkCsChunk* chunk = nullptr;
 
-    { std::lock_guard<sync::Spinlock> lock(m_mutex);
+    { std::lock_guard<dxvk::mutex> lock(m_mutex);
       
       if (m_chunks.size() != 0) {
         chunk = m_chunks.back();
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ namespace dxvk {
   void DxvkCsChunkPool::freeChunk(DxvkCsChunk* chunk) {
     chunk->reset();
     
-    std::lock_guard<sync::Spinlock> lock(m_mutex);
+    std::lock_guard<dxvk::mutex> lock(m_mutex);
     m_chunks.push_back(chunk);
   }
   
diff --git a/src/dxvk/dxvk_cs.h b/src/dxvk/dxvk_cs.h
index 77d5ad8d..ab2733c1 100644
--- a/src/dxvk/dxvk_cs.h
+++ b/src/dxvk/dxvk_cs.h
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ namespace dxvk {
     
   private:
     
-    sync::Spinlock            m_mutex;
+    dxvk::mutex               m_mutex;
     std::vector<DxvkCsChunk*> m_chunks;
     
   };